Disability people need education too
 

Welcome to our education for disability Archive!

 

Article #5: Bullying - Adults In The Schoolyard

(Browse for more articles)

 
The idea of bullying has long been factory worker was the subject of violent
associated with naughty children in a bullying he was wrapped in plastic by
schoolyard. But in recent years, there his co-workers, rolled around on a
has been increased awareness and trolley and covered in sawdust and glue.
recognition in Australia that adults can What is interesting here is that the
be bullies too. Nowhere is this notion director and factory foreman were found
more alive than in the workplace, where to be personally liable under s 26 of the
high stress levels and hierarchies create Act (liability of managers and
a framework for day to day life. directors), even though they were not
While the badly behaved child may be directly involved in the incident.
ordered to stay away from school for a Indeed, if the risk of bullying is
day, a bully in the workplace risks foreseeable, employers can be held
paying for her or his mistakes in a liable. In other words, they do not only
courtroom. Although there is no single have to react to bullying, they also need
statutory avenue for a claim in bullying, to be proactive in eliminating it so that
recent cases in New South Wales reveal they ensure a healthy and safe working
that there are a number of ways to seek environment.
redress and claim damages if an So the claim for bullying succeeded but
individual has been bullied in the what were the damages? When the case was
workplace. first heard, the company was fined
Bullying what does it mean? $24,000 and the director and the factory
There is no official legal definition of foreman were personally fined $1000 each.
bullying but there are a number of key But, in the second hearing, it was found
characteristics that are commonly used to that the penalties imposed were too low
describe bullying. The Law Society of New due to the seriousness of the matter and
South Wales describes bullying as the need for deterrrance. In other words,
behaviour that intimidates, offends, because bullying is often hidden or not
degrades, insults or humiliates an talked about, the court felt that
employee, possibly in front of deterring bullying in the future was a
co-workers, clients or customers and significant factor in determining the
which includes physical or psychological penalty. Ultimately, the personal fines
behaviour. were bumped up to $9,000 for the director
The essential ingredients of bullying and $12,000 for the factory foreman, who
are:behaviour that intimidates, offends was directly responsible for supervising
or humiliates;behaviour that places employers. Obviously, the courts have
someones physical or psychological realised that bullying is not a matter to
welfare at risk;usually, there is an be taken lightly.
element of repeated treatment or Other avenues to claim for damages
persistence (but this is decided on a In some cases, bullying in the workplace
case-by-case basis);and there is no may become so unbearable that a person is
intention needed. forced to resign from their job. Where
Examples of bullying include sarcasm, this occurs, it may be possible for a
threats, teasing or even physical person to claim for damages under the
isolation. In the 1997 case of Dillon v Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW). This
Arnotts Biscuits Ltd, a factory worker means that because a personal is
was forced to work at an isolated effectively forced to resign from their
workstation with her back to other job, an unfair dismissal claim arises and
employees, because the boss wanted to a person may be able to seek
toughen her up. This was described by the compensation. In Dillon v Arnotts
Australian Industrial Relations Biscuits, the court found that the
Commission as incessant bullying. On the incessant bullying of a factory worker by
other hand, one off instances such as her boss had led to constructive
someone swearing when they are stressed dismissal. She recommenced her work and
may not be considered bullying. was reimbursed for her lost income.
Claiming for damages Bullying in the workplace may also create
The Occupational Health and Safety Act a claim for damages if it constitues a
2000 is perhaps the most direct basis form of discrimination. In New South
upon which to claim damages for bullying Wales, it is against the law to bully or
in a New South Wales workplace. The first harass someone on the basis of their
stated goal in s 3 of this Act is race, sex, pregnancy, marital status,
precisely concerned with securing and religious beliefs, sexuality or
promoting the health, safety and welfare disability. This idea is captured in the
of people in the workplace. In s 8 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW), but
Act, the duties of an employer are listed there are also a number of Commonwealth
more specifically. Among other things, an Acts which prohibit discrimination in
employer is responsible for ensuring that (and out) of the workplace.
systems of work and the working From the boardroom to the courtroom
environment of the employees are safe and Bullying is bad for the workplace because
without risk to health. it reduces efficiency, motivation and
In the 2004 case of Inspector Maddaford v self-confidence, as well as increasing
Coleman, the New South Wales Industrial stress, anxiety and mental health days.
Relations Commission confirmed an earlier But nowadays, bullying in the workplace
decision that a timber joinery company is also a potential lawsuit. It is
had breached its duty under s 8 of the apparent in the law and in the courtroom
Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 that bullying can give rise to claims for
by failing to ensure a healthy and safe damages in New South Wales.
workplace. In this case, a 16 year old






1 - A - B - C - D - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38 - 39 - 40 - 41 - 42 - 43 - 44 -