Get Your CV Right and You Don't Need Anti Age-Discrimination Laws

Without going into the fine detail, on 1st October in theSo often the CV submitted by an older worker would
UK, the new laws to provide protection againstbe a long document, filled with highly detailed
age-discrimination in employment and adult education,paragraphs about all of the duties and responsibilities
for people of all ages came into force. But will theythat the worker had ever held. The attitude would be
work?"my work history speaks for itself".
The new law will cover discrimination in employmentThe inherent problem in this approach is twofold:
and in training and education, but not in provision of1. The document may mistakenly be taken to include
goods and services - as far as work or careers goeverything; so if you have overlooked one element
then the two areas that matter are:that the employer is seeking, you're dead in the water
Direct Discrimination:and the anti age-discrimination laws didn't help.
Treating someone less favorably because of their age2. Employers want people who will add value, so this
i.e. refusing to recruit someone because they are ortype of CV, with its reliance on duties and
appear to be over 50 say.responsibilities will let you down straight away.
Indirect Discrimination:The solution to that is a radical rethink of your CV.
Having a policy or practices that put people at aWhen you apply it is the only evidence that the
disadvantage because of their age i.e. restrictingprospective employer has about you so it needs to be
recruitment to new graduates. Not many older peoplegood, okay? Help yourself and don't fall foul of the
could meet this type of requirement.anti-age discrimination laws.
All of this only applies to people who are under theWhat you need a CV that is strong on design,
normal retirement age (usually 65) and anyone overconstruction and content; it must look good, be easy to
this age, or within six months of it, still has no protection.read and contain only enough RELEVANT detail to
All well and good you say, but these new laws - willconvince the reader that you should be called for
they work? It may sound cynical but some employers'interview (that is the job you want it to do) - because
attitudes are so entrenched that any new law like thisthey want to know more about you - focus on your
will only lead to more imaginative excuses being given.successful outcomes and avoid telling any lies.
If they think you are too old, they will simply findKeep it relevant to the particular job you want and
another reason not to employ you and you are usuallyinclude facts and figures on budgets, staff numbers,
the one to give it to them.your achievements and results. Employers want
This means that you need to be extra-careful not toresults - this is your showcase for what they may be
give them any reason they could use against youbuying.
when you first apply.The reader needs just enough specific information to
As a one-time recruitment consultant, I saw many ofconclude:
my clients reject applicants because of their age. The"I must interview this candidate" The anti
quality of their CVs was usually behind that decision.age-discrimination laws don't come into it.