The Challenges With Enterprise Content Management

Having been involved with a number of enterprisecostly and ultimately can create a very confusing set
content management (ECM) projects throughout myof interfaces.
career, many factors can impact the success orDocument Policies and Procedures
failure of such an initiative. Oftentimes, organizationsAnother big challenge in an ECM implementation is that
inadequately assess their business needs orcompanies either don't document policies and
prematurely select a system before defining theirprocedures for document/records/content
processes. As a result, getting ECM right can be amanagement, or don't have sufficient governance and
challenge for even the most unlimited technical andoversight over those digital objects. This may not be
financial resources.as evident in ECM implementations where the assets
Utilizing technology, ECM provides organizations with aare contracts or HR files, but it becomes a major
framework to define processes associated withproblem when the ECM implementation is about digital
creating, enriching/annotating, managing and deliveringassets. In those kinds of implementations, it is not
content to both internal and external stakeholders. Iunusual to find numerous duplicate files, or worse, small
have found that ECM has come to signify more achanges in versions that are almost imperceptible, but
broad range of technologies and business needs thannot documented. The challenge I have found is that
an actual monolithic product offering.people just stuff those old files into their ECM like they
Getting Startedwould old mementoes in a box in the attic, those
One of the very first challenges organizationsassets will be as difficult to find as the sundry
encounter when looking at ECM is what the solutionknick-knacks of yesteryear.
should encompass. Kyle McNabb at ForresterUnderstand the Data Types
Research asserts that ECM encompasses documentOne of the biggest challenges that many companies
management, Web content management, documentmust overcome is how to manage chunks of
imaging, records management, and digital assetinformation in different file formats. That data has to
management, and is closely aligned with collaborationbe stored in elemental form and its physical, business,
and business process management ("Topic Overview:and semantic properties somehow captured, either
Enterprise Content Management" Kyle McNabb,automatically or through manual data entry. While an
Forrester, March 2008). Recently, Tony Byrne of CMSECM solution can seem expansive and complex, it is
Watch and several other industry analysts working onmy opinion that companies should think small and look
the ECM3 initiative (Enterprise Content Managementto the objects themselves that need to be stored.
Maturity Model) have offered up the notion that ECMThat way, even if there were missteps in the ECM
should not cover Web content management andimplementation, at least you have protected yourself in
"related publishing-oriented disciplines." (cite: ecm3.org)the future by properly storing and describing the
My bias is actually around the management of contentmasses of content elements.
objects for the purpose of preservation and reuse inMetadata and Taxonomy
different contexts. This includes delivery to print, Web,Still another area of challenge in ECM is defining,
mobile, e-reader devices as well as repackagingapplying, and managing descriptive information about
different content objects to create new offerings. Mycontent objects. Companies are often overzealous
view of ECM consists of Web content management,about the information they'd like users to apply to
digital asset management, some aspects of documentcontent, and in the process create dozens of fields of
management, and other multi-channel applicationmetadata that need to be entered with each upload of
components. Additionally, for content publishers, Ian object. Recently, companies are looking to
believe XML server and natural language processingimplement natural language processing (NLP) tools that
technologies may be closely aligned with an ECMcan extract meaning out of textual content objects
strategy. I am not saying that records managementbased on specially-prepared taxonomies that are
and digital imaging cannot be part of an ECM strategyrelevant to the business.
- only that my particular clients typically handle thoseThis is a promising trend, but the technology is
business requirements separately from the actualexpensive, and I currently am not seeing that wide
needs around creating, annotating/enriching, managingadoption of text mining engines. However, companies
and delivering content.that view this as a severe problem and are investing in
First Process, Then Technologythe research to determine their return on investment
Getting started on ECM can be overwhelming aswill buy these NLP solutions. As the price points go
there are so many critical components - people,down, more systems will have NLP embedded as part
process, technology, budget, management buy-in, etc.of the solution, this will increase adoption.
What we have found is that our clients are perfectlyDon't Go it Alone
satisfied to focus on the specific challenges they areIt always amazes me when companies elect to
trying to solve and not get hung up on the broad rangeimplement ECM solutions by themselves. The
of what ECM means to industry analysts or softwaretechnologies and workflows associated with
vendors. For example, if a client is looking to managedocument, records, and digital asset management
records or documents, they will gather requirementsrequire deep technical expertise. However, I can
and document use cases specific to that need, whichunderstand that a big issue companies have is that
may or may not include digital asset management. Thisvendors or consultancies may send technical
does not exempt the company from trying to mapresources with expertise in the technology but not the
their overall ECM strategy and the appropriatesubject matter expertise. This is invariably one of the
technologies that will support it. However, it speaks tobiggest challenges where business and functional
the need for a phased approach to implementing therequirements, use cases, system architectures and
various domains of ECM as opposed to trying tointegration plans fall short.
implement it all at once.One way to get around that is to make sure that you
One Size Does Not Fit Allhire a consultancy who is not only expert in the
Vendors and others in the industry may argue that totechnology but has also worked within your vertical
implement ECM successfully you need to stick with amarket(s) and understands the business challenges.
single software provider's application stack. In reality,Otherwise, the next-best thing is to get your subject
different vendors are stronger in certain areas - saymatter experts (SME's) trained in the technology and
document management, for instance - but weaker inhire a technically deft consulting shop to support the
areas such as digital asset management or WebSME.
content management. Given the considerable costs ofTake a Phased Approach
implementing an ECM platform, this is another strongI've seen companies try to implement too many things
case for focusing on solving the business challengesat once, which is less an issue about ECM than about
that either offer up measurable productivity gains or, inenterprise project management. It is worth repeating
the case of multi-channel publishing capabilities of ECM,here that a phased approach with 30/60/90 day
new revenue models.development and integration cycles remains the safest
Start With Your Business and Functional Requirementsway to implement any kind of technology(ies). Also,
Try to organize those requirements into the domainswhen in doubt about an approach, performing proof of
of functionality that ECM appears to handle. Do NOTconcept or spike tests is a good way to test technical
start from product suites, since you will get distractedhypotheses to determine their efficacy.
by the product capabilities and potentially lose sight ofDefine the Scope
your specific needs.On a regular basis I get called into customers at the
Analyze Workflowdepartmental level to help that group get what they
Companies often get caught up with trying tomight call an "enterprise content strategy" documented.
implement workflow in ECM initiatives, which is aHowever, it becomes clear that this is an enterprise
worthy endeavor if workflows are well defined andstrategy for their own departmental needs, and in fact
adhered to. However if you have issues with existingthere might be other departments that already have
workflows, you may re-enforce bad processes withECM technologies and practices in place that would
technology, which will make matters worse.not be relevant to my customer. I don't have a magic
Additionally, if you do not have consensus aboutanswer here - I think the safest thing to do is to
workflow(s), you may run into change managementdocument the department's requirements, then go to
(user adoption) issues when you go to rollout phase.other divisions/segments of the business to see if
Companies often have poorly-defined workflows orwhat they have implemented can fit the documented
too many exceptions within a workflow, and trying toneeds.
capture them all in your ECM implementation will be