| One of the toughest jobs of the project manager is | | | | days the program had only received 60% of the |
| making sure you actually receive the resources you | | | | resources we needed. |
| have been given for your project. People resources | | | | |
| are the trickiest of all because each person assigned | | | | The smaller the time commitment, the lower our |
| to you can choose to come to your meetings or not, | | | | project sat within each individual’s priority list. Once |
| answer their phone or not, respond to your e-mails or | | | | the buy-out was announced, missed meetings and |
| not, review materials you send them or not, do their | | | | delayed meetings became rampant. Within this 90-day |
| work on time or not, and so on. | | | | window, we had only one three-week period where |
| | | | | we operated at full strength. |
| If your team members are also your employees, then | | | | |
| you have tremendous influence over these decisions. | | | | It is worth noting that even with this chronic 40% |
| But in many project situations - virtually all large project | | | | matrixed resource shortfall, our project suffered only a |
| situations - your team members are not your | | | | 20% delay in deliverables. The reason is we still had |
| employees, instead they are ‘borrowed’ from | | | | dedicated resources in the most critical positions, and |
| other managers in the company. | | | | they were able to create all sorts of workaround |
| | | | | solutions that helped us make substantial progress in |
| This means their number-one priority is NOT you or | | | | the face of otherwise overwhelming resource losses. |
| your project; their top priority is pleasing and meeting | | | | |
| the needs of their line manager. | | | | Since matrixed resources with split-time allocations are |
| | | | | a fact of life in projects, how can you manage them |
| If you get people resources on a ‘dedicated’ | | | | successfully? |
| basis – meaning you get 100% of their time for the | | | | |
| duration of your project – then their manager has | | | | The solution is 3-fold: |
| pretty much handed them over to you. You | | | | |
| effectively become their line manager for that time | | | | 1) Staff your team with the ‘right’ mix of |
| period, usually up to and including giving input to their | | | | dedicated and split-time resources. |
| performance, salary and bonus reviews. | | | | |
| | | | | For medium and large projects, in general, the shorter |
| However, in any situation where an employee has to | | | | the timeline, the more dedicated resources you need. |
| split his or her time between working for their line | | | | And, the more complex the project, the more |
| manager and working for your project - even if you | | | | dedicated resources you will need, so each key |
| negotiate prorated input to their performance reviews | | | | aspect of the project gets needed attention and |
| - you need to understand that the other manager has | | | | creative leadership brainpower. Even if your project |
| far greater influence over their time and decisions than | | | | is well underway as you read this, you can always |
| you have. You will have to deal with that fact for the | | | | step back and re-negotiate time commitments, if |
| duration of your project. | | | | needed. |
| | | | | |
| It is a good practice to be wary of time commitments | | | | 2) Track the time you actually receive from |
| for any resource assigned to you on a split-time basis, | | | | your resources each week and note any shortfalls, no |
| particularly if anyone is allocated to you less than 50%. | | | | matter how small. |
| Here is: | | | | |
| | | | | This is largely a guesstimation exercise you and your |
| Why a less-than-50% allocation so often fails: | | | | leads conduct at the end of each week. If you wait |
| | | | | till after the weekend, you will have already forgotten |
| - Human nature is such that both you and the | | | | how the week went. If you wait for your time |
| person’s line manager will both attempt to task this | | | | tracking reports – in the event your company not |
| person 100% anyway, creating a situation in which all | | | | only has time tracking tools but actually uses them – |
| three of you will lose. | | | | not only will the data be too late, it will usually be |
| | | | | incomplete. In most companies, your pivotal business |
| - Human nature also dictates that if it comes to making | | | | and management people aren’t required to use |
| a choice between pleasing you or pleasing a line | | | | those tools. |
| manager, then the person will choose the one who has | | | | |
| the most impact on salary, bonuses, performance | | | | 3) Take immediate action to win back your |
| reviews, and job security. In a matrix situation, you lose. | | | | allocated time from any shortfall resource(s). |
| | | | | |
| - People in this situation inevitably find their energy and | | | | Don’t take a ‘wait and see’ approach if |
| attention is fragmented between the project and all | | | | someone misses a meeting or is late in a task or a |
| other work. It takes more time and effort on your part | | | | response. Instead, immediately follow-up and find out |
| to keep such team members up-do-date on | | | | if this is a one-time event or a warning sign of more |
| what’s happening in the project. They, in turn, lose | | | | misses to come. Find out what your team member |
| track and lose momentum switching back and forth. | | | | needs in order to be able to attend all future |
| | | | | meetings. Work with them, and their line manager if |
| - People whose time is fragmented miss meetings. | | | | necessary, to clear up any conflicts or issues. Then |
| Your project is now subject to the whims and | | | | figure out to make up for the time that was lost, so |
| inefficiencies of whatever else is going on in their | | | | you can make sure your project stays on track. |
| non-project time. When emergencies crop up in those | | | | |
| areas, your project suffers. | | | | These three items are common sense solutions, but it |
| | | | | is surprisingly uncommon to see a project manager do |
| The worse case I ever saw of this was when I was | | | | them all. Be one of the uncommon few! Since |
| working as a consultant to one Fortune 500 company | | | | missing-in-action resources are such a challenging and |
| during a time period in which they started and | | | | chronic issue in many projects, there is a good chance |
| concluded buy-out negotiations with another Fortune | | | | at least one of these three options can help you |
| 500 company. People who had been assigned to my | | | | today. |
| project on a split-time basis suddenly began skipping | | | | For more information visit to check into the book, look |
| project meetings because they were getting pulled by | | | | for Barb’s micro project management sessions on |
| their line managers into meetings related to the | | | | U-Tube, or e-mail with any questions. |
| buy-out. The impact to my project was that after 90 | | | | |